🔗 Share this article

The last time Vladimir Putin traveled to the South Asian nation four years ago, the global landscape was markedly different. That short trip, curtailed by the pandemic, focused on talks on economic and military ties between the two leaders.

Months later, the full-scale invasion of Ukraine would transform the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, greatly limiting his diplomatic travel.

Additionally, that era came before a significant shift in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by contentious rhetoric and the introduction of substantial import duties.

"Against this backdrop, the significance of Putin's journey to meet Modi is profound, serving as a signal of resilient relations and a defiance of external pressure," analysts note.

A Pivotal Moment for Two Major Powers

The summit takes place at a crucial time. The Kremlin leader comes following dismissing recent diplomatic initiatives for Ukraine, confident due to claimed advances by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this engagement is its very occurrence," commented a prominent analyst based in Moscow. "It indicates a return to a form of normal international relations."

From Delhi's standpoint, the stakes are particularly elevated. The country faces a difficult geopolitical climate, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a diminished Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

This delicate balance was highlighted just before the visit, when European ambassadors released a public commentary questioning Russia's commitment to peace. This prompted a sharp response from Indian officials, who labeled it an unacceptable diplomatic practice.

The Enduring Challenge from the North

The India-Russia bond dates back to the Soviet period and remains deeply entrenched, with Moscow historically being Delhi's top arms provider. This relationship was generally accepted by the West before a recent shift.

Over time, Western nations ignored India's substantial purchases of cheap energy from Russia. However, in the wake of failed peace efforts, pressure mounted, leading to punitive tariffs and a significant downturn in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"Consequently, India has returned to its traditional posture of maintaining multiple options," noted a foreign policy expert. "This demonstrates to the US that it has alternatives and is observing how the global dynamics settle."

Apart from international politics, India's core motivation with Russia is geography. "Beijing continues to be the primary security challenge to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst added.

The deepening partnership between Russia and China has caused concern in Delhi, leading to efforts to avoid an unbreakable bond between its northern neighbor and its longtime partner.

This apprehension has also accelerated India's drive to reduce its military imports, shrinking its reliance on Russian equipment from a dominant share to a reduced portion in recent years.

"Delhi will try to find a middle ground: buy sufficient Russian arms to keep the partnership alive, but not become so dependent that a supply disruption would leave it vulnerable," the analyst concluded.

The Oil Question

Increased economic cooperation is expected to be a major topic. President Putin has recently stressed plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "qualitatively new level", defying Western sanctions.

The issue of crude oil purchases remains central. Although the Indian government has vowed to keep buying Russian oil, new sanctions have slowed activity from the commercial buyers. Simultaneously, India has moved to increase imports of American oil and gas.

A Russian official acknowledged "obstacles" in energy trade but insisted it would continue uninterrupted. The official minimized the effect of sanctions, stating they would cause only "minor" and "brief" drops and that Russia possesses the "technology" to circumvent them.

Limited Leverage on Ukraine

When the two leaders sit down, the topic of Ukraine is likely to be mentioned mainly through India's consistent appeal for a peaceful resolution.

"Yes, Prime Minister Modi can speak to both sides, India lacks the necessary leverage to alter the course of the war," the analyst noted. "Aside from encouraging talks, its capacity to effect change is constrained."

Ultimately, notwithstanding the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pragmatic strategic interest," guided by national interest in a rapidly changing world.